https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759549 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), due to non-compliance with statutory pre-deposit requirements. The appellant's use of the DRC-03 form for pre-deposit was deemed impermissible under Section 35F, as it did not align with prescribed payment methods. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to CBIC instructions and statutory mandates, concluding the appellant's payment was inadequate to rectify initial non-compliance. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759549 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), due to non-compliance with statutory pre-deposit requirements. The appellant's use of the DRC-03 form for pre-deposit was deemed impermissible under Section 35F, as it did not align with prescribed payment methods. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to CBIC instructions and statutory mandates, concluding the appellant's payment was inadequate to rectify initial non-compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759549