<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759555</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Delhi HC applied Article 21 and the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, while considering the twin conditions under Section 45. It noted that the investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, the allegations were supported mainly by documentary material, diary entries and alleged bank transactions, and the applicant had been in custody for about two and a half years. As the applicant had deep roots in society, was not shown to be a flight risk, and release was unlikely to affect the evidence, the statutory rigour did not justify continued pre-trial incarceration. Regular bail was granted, subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759555</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Delhi HC applied Article 21 and the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, while considering the twin conditions under Section 45. It noted that the investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, the allegations were supported mainly by documentary material, diary entries and alleged bank transactions, and the applicant had been in custody for about two and a half years. As the applicant had deep roots in society, was not shown to be a flight risk, and release was unlikely to affect the evidence, the statutory rigour did not justify continued pre-trial incarceration. Regular bail was granted, subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>