<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 162 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759563</link>
    <description>The enhanced monetary threshold for filing appeals to the Supreme Court governed maintainability, and because the admitted tax effect was below the revised limit, the Civil Appeals and Special Leave Petition were disposed of. The questions of law were expressly left open, so no substantive issue was decided on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 162 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759563</link>
      <description>The enhanced monetary threshold for filing appeals to the Supreme Court governed maintainability, and because the admitted tax effect was below the revised limit, the Civil Appeals and Special Leave Petition were disposed of. The questions of law were expressly left open, so no substantive issue was decided on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>