<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 176 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759577</link>
    <description>An assessee&#039;s reply to a Section 148A(b) notice must be considered before an order under Section 148A(d) and a Section 148 notice are issued; where the record shows the reply was received before the impugned action, the assumption that there was no response is unsustainable. On that basis, the Madras HC set aside the impugned order and notice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after taking the reply on record and granting a personal hearing, subject to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:19:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 176 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759577</link>
      <description>An assessee&#039;s reply to a Section 148A(b) notice must be considered before an order under Section 148A(d) and a Section 148 notice are issued; where the record shows the reply was received before the impugned action, the assumption that there was no response is unsustainable. On that basis, the Madras HC set aside the impugned order and notice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after taking the reply on record and granting a personal hearing, subject to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>