<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 201 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759602</link>
    <description>HC ruled that initiating parallel penalty proceedings under CGST and State GST Acts is legally impermissible. The court quashed the show cause notice, finding it illegal and without jurisdiction, based on Sections 6 and 74 of the CGST Act. The judgment prevents dual proceedings involving the same subject matter and protects against redundant penalty actions by different GST authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 22:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 201 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759602</link>
      <description>HC ruled that initiating parallel penalty proceedings under CGST and State GST Acts is legally impermissible. The court quashed the show cause notice, finding it illegal and without jurisdiction, based on Sections 6 and 74 of the CGST Act. The judgment prevents dual proceedings involving the same subject matter and protects against redundant penalty actions by different GST authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>