<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 203 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759604</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, directing restoration of GST registration after finding compliance with Rule 86B requirements. Despite respondents&#039; arguments about technical deposit method and listing as potential fake firm, court emphasized minimal statutory violation and potential business harm. Order permits future statutory proceedings while mandating immediate registration reinstatement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 22:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 203 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759604</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, directing restoration of GST registration after finding compliance with Rule 86B requirements. Despite respondents&#039; arguments about technical deposit method and listing as potential fake firm, court emphasized minimal statutory violation and potential business harm. Order permits future statutory proceedings while mandating immediate registration reinstatement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>