<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1461 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458018</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition filed by state authorities due to laches, as it was filed more than two years after the impugned order without any application for condonation of delay or explanation. The court relied on SC precedent requiring proper and convincing reasons for delay in state filings, noting that administrative exigencies alone are insufficient justification unless proven justified. The petition was dismissed solely on grounds of unreasonable delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 20:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1461 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458018</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition filed by state authorities due to laches, as it was filed more than two years after the impugned order without any application for condonation of delay or explanation. The court relied on SC precedent requiring proper and convincing reasons for delay in state filings, noting that administrative exigencies alone are insufficient justification unless proven justified. The petition was dismissed solely on grounds of unreasonable delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>