https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458021 A rectification application was rejected where the applicant claimed the appellate order wrongly noted absence of registration. The Tribunal held that the paragraph in question merely recorded the facts as they existed at that stage, and the later obtaining of registration did not show any apparent mistake on the record. As no fresh material was produced to establish that customs law was inapplicable or that the earlier findings were legally flawed, no basis for recall or rectification was made out. The earlier order therefore remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Oct 2024 20:06:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458021 A rectification application was rejected where the applicant claimed the appellate order wrongly noted absence of registration. The Tribunal held that the paragraph in question merely recorded the facts as they existed at that stage, and the later obtaining of registration did not show any apparent mistake on the record. As no fresh material was produced to establish that customs law was inapplicable or that the earlier findings were legally flawed, no basis for recall or rectification was made out. The earlier order therefore remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458021