<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 310 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458014</link>
    <description>In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, delay and laches are only a relevant discretionary factor and do not create an absolute bar to relief where the claim is otherwise just. The note states that belated writ petitions challenging income-tax assessment proceedings could still be entertained on merits, and that the scope of Sections 143 and 144 of the Income-tax Act had already been addressed in an earlier Division Bench decision relied on by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 310 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458014</link>
      <description>In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, delay and laches are only a relevant discretionary factor and do not create an absolute bar to relief where the claim is otherwise just. The note states that belated writ petitions challenging income-tax assessment proceedings could still be entertained on merits, and that the scope of Sections 143 and 144 of the Income-tax Act had already been addressed in an earlier Division Bench decision relied on by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>