https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458009 An appeal filed beyond the statutory 90-day period under the appellate provision of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could not be entertained where the delay was admitted and the appellate forum had no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the prescribed limit. The authority held that once the appeal was instituted after expiry of the permissible period, the defect was fatal at the threshold. Condonation was therefore refused for want of jurisdiction, and the proceeding failed as time barred. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:37:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458009 An appeal filed beyond the statutory 90-day period under the appellate provision of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could not be entertained where the delay was admitted and the appellate forum had no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the prescribed limit. The authority held that once the appeal was instituted after expiry of the permissible period, the defect was fatal at the threshold. Condonation was therefore refused for want of jurisdiction, and the proceeding failed as time barred. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 06 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458009