https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458000 Under Article 22(5), only the basic facts and materials forming the foundation of preventive detention and influencing the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be supplied to the detenu; documents with only casual reference or no real nexus need not be furnished. The non-placement of the taxi driver's statement and non-supply of the retraction letter did not vitiate detention because the detenu's own statement and co-accused statements already provided sufficient incriminating material, and the retraction reached Customs only on the date of the order. The use of disjunctive wording in the grounds did not show non-application of mind, and non-furnishing of the remand proceedings, denial statement, and referred documents did not establish a constitutional violation. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Oct 2024 10:56:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458000 Under Article 22(5), only the basic facts and materials forming the foundation of preventive detention and influencing the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be supplied to the detenu; documents with only casual reference or no real nexus need not be furnished. The non-placement of the taxi driver's statement and non-supply of the retraction letter did not vitiate detention because the detenu's own statement and co-accused statements already provided sufficient incriminating material, and the retraction reached Customs only on the date of the order. The use of disjunctive wording in the grounds did not show non-application of mind, and non-furnishing of the remand proceedings, denial statement, and referred documents did not establish a constitutional violation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458000