https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457998 In preventive detention matters, the Advisory Board's confidential opinion need not be communicated to the detenu because the statute requires only that it be submitted to the appropriate Government, and confirmation of detention sufficiently informs the detenu that the opinion was adverse. However, a detention order made without proper application of mind, including mechanical reproduction of statutory language without appreciating the distinction between the relevant enactments, is unsustainable. The non-communication objection was rejected, while the defect of mechanical drafting rendered the detention order invalid and liable to be set aside. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Oct 2024 10:42:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457998 In preventive detention matters, the Advisory Board's confidential opinion need not be communicated to the detenu because the statute requires only that it be submitted to the appropriate Government, and confirmation of detention sufficiently informs the detenu that the opinion was adverse. However, a detention order made without proper application of mind, including mechanical reproduction of statutory language without appreciating the distinction between the relevant enactments, is unsustainable. The non-communication objection was rejected, while the defect of mechanical drafting rendered the detention order invalid and liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457998