https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38607 The High Court of Allahabad ruled that the service of notice of demand on the assessee via affixture did not comply with the standards set by Order V, rule 17. While considering compliance with Order V, rule 20, the court emphasized the need for specific conditions to justify such service. As the court found insufficient material to support the order for service by affixture, it quashed the notices of demand and the property attachment order. The respondents were directed not to enforce tax based on these notices and to withdraw the attachment order, with the petition allowed with costs. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:19:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38607 The High Court of Allahabad ruled that the service of notice of demand on the assessee via affixture did not comply with the standards set by Order V, rule 17. While considering compliance with Order V, rule 20, the court emphasized the need for specific conditions to justify such service. As the court found insufficient material to support the order for service by affixture, it quashed the notices of demand and the property attachment order. The respondents were directed not to enforce tax based on these notices and to withdraw the attachment order, with the petition allowed with costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 23 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38607