<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 43 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759444</link>
    <description>SC dismissed appeals challenging NCDRC order regarding joint liability in property development dispute. Appellants executed irrevocable power of attorney and JAV with developer but only attempted to revoke power of attorney while JAV remained in force. Court held appellants cannot disclaim liability for developer&#039;s acts when they took no action against alleged non-compliance and JAV continues to operate. NCDRC&#039;s finding of joint liability upheld as appellants&#039; position was inconsistent and without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 07:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 43 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759444</link>
      <description>SC dismissed appeals challenging NCDRC order regarding joint liability in property development dispute. Appellants executed irrevocable power of attorney and JAV with developer but only attempted to revoke power of attorney while JAV remained in force. Court held appellants cannot disclaim liability for developer&#039;s acts when they took no action against alleged non-compliance and JAV continues to operate. NCDRC&#039;s finding of joint liability upheld as appellants&#039; position was inconsistent and without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>