https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759458 Writ proceedings were withdrawn after the petitioners acknowledged that alternative remedies were available: a statutory appeal lay against respondents No. 1 to 3 and a civil suit for damages could be pursued against respondent No. 4. The court permitted withdrawal and granted liberty to pursue those remedies. It also allowed the petitioners four weeks to file the statutory appeal, directing that if filed within that period the appellate forum should decide it on merits without treating limitation as a bar, while limitation would run again after that period. Claims against respondent No. 4 were left to be pursued before the civil court subject to applicable limitation. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Oct 2024 07:50:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759458 Writ proceedings were withdrawn after the petitioners acknowledged that alternative remedies were available: a statutory appeal lay against respondents No. 1 to 3 and a civil suit for damages could be pursued against respondent No. 4. The court permitted withdrawal and granted liberty to pursue those remedies. It also allowed the petitioners four weeks to file the statutory appeal, directing that if filed within that period the appellate forum should decide it on merits without treating limitation as a bar, while limitation would run again after that period. Claims against respondent No. 4 were left to be pursued before the civil court subject to applicable limitation. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759458