<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 58 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759459</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied the doctrine of binding precedent and disposed of the civil appeals in line with its earlier decision in K. Arumugam v. Union of India and Ors., after both sides accepted that the issues were squarely covered by that judgment. On that basis, the Court held that the proper course was to follow the earlier ruling, and the appeals were allowed and disposed of accordingly. All pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 58 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759459</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied the doctrine of binding precedent and disposed of the civil appeals in line with its earlier decision in K. Arumugam v. Union of India and Ors., after both sides accepted that the issues were squarely covered by that judgment. On that basis, the Court held that the proper course was to follow the earlier ruling, and the appeals were allowed and disposed of accordingly. All pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>