<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 36 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38604</link>
    <description>An assessment made under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for an assessment year governed by the 1922 Act was treated as a technical irregularity, not a nullity, because the assessing officer had jurisdiction under the correct statutory regime. The appellate authority could therefore set aside the assessment and direct a fresh assessment, and limitation did not bar that assessment when made in consequence of the appellate direction. Provisional assessment under section 23B was described as a separate machinery for speedy tax collection and did not merge with the regular assessment. Accordingly, setting aside the regular assessment did not extinguish the provisional tax liability, and a mistaken refund of that tax could be rectified as an apparent error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 36 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38604</link>
      <description>An assessment made under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for an assessment year governed by the 1922 Act was treated as a technical irregularity, not a nullity, because the assessing officer had jurisdiction under the correct statutory regime. The appellate authority could therefore set aside the assessment and direct a fresh assessment, and limitation did not bar that assessment when made in consequence of the appellate direction. Provisional assessment under section 23B was described as a separate machinery for speedy tax collection and did not merge with the regular assessment. Accordingly, setting aside the regular assessment did not extinguish the provisional tax liability, and a mistaken refund of that tax could be rectified as an apparent error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>