<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 65 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759466</link>
    <description>The customs classification dispute was not decided on the merits; it was left for examination by the adjudicating authority at the appropriate stage, and the petitioner was given liberty to pursue the remedy available under law. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of without a substantive determination of classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 65 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759466</link>
      <description>The customs classification dispute was not decided on the merits; it was left for examination by the adjudicating authority at the appropriate stage, and the petitioner was given liberty to pursue the remedy available under law. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of without a substantive determination of classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>