<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 82 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759483</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata ruled against the assessee regarding delayed deposit of PF/ESI contributions. The tribunal held that deduction under Section 36(1)(va) for delayed deposit of employee PF contributions cannot be claimed even when deposited within the due date of filing returns, following SC precedent in Chekmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The issue was settled law and no longer res-integra, with the deduction being disallowed despite provisions of Section 43B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 16:53:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 82 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759483</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata ruled against the assessee regarding delayed deposit of PF/ESI contributions. The tribunal held that deduction under Section 36(1)(va) for delayed deposit of employee PF contributions cannot be claimed even when deposited within the due date of filing returns, following SC precedent in Chekmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The issue was settled law and no longer res-integra, with the deduction being disallowed despite provisions of Section 43B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>