<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 99 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759500</link>
    <description>Denial of charitable exemption under Section 11 turned on procedural non-compliance in furnishing Form 10B; the tribunal and appellate authority applied an equitable, balancing approach and condoned delay where the assessee electronically filed the audit report in Form 10B and audited financial statements during pendency of appeals, producing restoration of exemption. A binding strict interpretation from a separate precedent requiring pre-return declaration was distinguished as factually inapplicable, and the appellate findings upholding condonation were sustained, resulting in dismissal of the further appeal and no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 99 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759500</link>
      <description>Denial of charitable exemption under Section 11 turned on procedural non-compliance in furnishing Form 10B; the tribunal and appellate authority applied an equitable, balancing approach and condoned delay where the assessee electronically filed the audit report in Form 10B and audited financial statements during pendency of appeals, producing restoration of exemption. A binding strict interpretation from a separate precedent requiring pre-return declaration was distinguished as factually inapplicable, and the appellate findings upholding condonation were sustained, resulting in dismissal of the further appeal and no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>