<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759505</link>
    <description>HC quashed reopening notice u/s 147 for AY 2017-18. Petitioner&#039;s assessment was completed u/s 143(3) after furnishing all materials including detailed responses to s.142(1) notice. Claims for bad debts and advance written off were not disturbed in original assessment. Court held reopening was based on AO&#039;s change of opinion rather than valid reasons, lacking merit. Writ petitions allowed, impugned notice and order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 07:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759505</link>
      <description>HC quashed reopening notice u/s 147 for AY 2017-18. Petitioner&#039;s assessment was completed u/s 143(3) after furnishing all materials including detailed responses to s.142(1) notice. Claims for bad debts and advance written off were not disturbed in original assessment. Court held reopening was based on AO&#039;s change of opinion rather than valid reasons, lacking merit. Writ petitions allowed, impugned notice and order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>