<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 124 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759525</link>
    <description>HC set aside GST tax orders due to lack of proper consideration of petitioner&#039;s replies. Court found respondent did not adequately examine submitted reconciliations and explanations. Ordered de novo proceedings, directing respondent to provide personal hearing, review additional documents, and issue reasoned orders within three months. Emphasized procedural fairness in tax adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 23:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 124 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759525</link>
      <description>HC set aside GST tax orders due to lack of proper consideration of petitioner&#039;s replies. Court found respondent did not adequately examine submitted reconciliations and explanations. Ordered de novo proceedings, directing respondent to provide personal hearing, review additional documents, and issue reasoned orders within three months. Emphasized procedural fairness in tax adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>