<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 125 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759526</link>
    <description>An impugned tax order passed without affording personal hearing was treated as contrary to natural justice, because the assessee was denied an opportunity to place its case on merits. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, with directions for notice, filing of objections, and personal hearing before the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 23:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 125 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759526</link>
      <description>An impugned tax order passed without affording personal hearing was treated as contrary to natural justice, because the assessee was denied an opportunity to place its case on merits. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, with directions for notice, filing of objections, and personal hearing before the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>