<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1325 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457980</link>
    <description>A cognizance and summoning order issued on a printed proforma, without recorded reasons or application of mind, was held unsustainable because a summoning order affecting an accused&#039;s rights must be a speaking and reasoned order. The High Court followed its earlier view that such mechanically issued orders are disapproved, and set aside the impugned order. The matter was remitted to the Magistrate to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after proper consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 20:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1325 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457980</link>
      <description>A cognizance and summoning order issued on a printed proforma, without recorded reasons or application of mind, was held unsustainable because a summoning order affecting an accused&#039;s rights must be a speaking and reasoned order. The High Court followed its earlier view that such mechanically issued orders are disapproved, and set aside the impugned order. The matter was remitted to the Magistrate to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after proper consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>