<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1524 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457986</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, which was issued without oral hearings, and remanded the case for fresh proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of oral arguments, particularly when addressing requests for cross-examination and obtaining copies of orders with reasons. Both appeals were disposed of, directing the parties to appear before the Authority for new orders following oral arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 20:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1524 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457986</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, which was issued without oral hearings, and remanded the case for fresh proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of oral arguments, particularly when addressing requests for cross-examination and obtaining copies of orders with reasons. Both appeals were disposed of, directing the parties to appear before the Authority for new orders following oral arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>