<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 352 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457946</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty for non-realization of export proceeds from the initial amount to Rs. 60,000. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s financial constraints and circumstances surrounding the exports. The appeal was modified to reflect this reduced penalty, with the appellant given thirty days to comply. If the revised penalty is not paid within this period, the respondents are authorized to recover the penalty as per legal procedures. The Tribunal found justification for penalty reduction due to the appellant&#039;s sole proprietorship and the absence of foreign exchange retention outside the country.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 352 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457946</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty for non-realization of export proceeds from the initial amount to Rs. 60,000. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s financial constraints and circumstances surrounding the exports. The appeal was modified to reflect this reduced penalty, with the appellant given thirty days to comply. If the revised penalty is not paid within this period, the respondents are authorized to recover the penalty as per legal procedures. The Tribunal found justification for penalty reduction due to the appellant&#039;s sole proprietorship and the absence of foreign exchange retention outside the country.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>