<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 192 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457965</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed by the court, affirming the adjudication order, including penalties and confiscation. It was upheld that Associated Travel Agency (P.) Ltd. and the individual involved contravened Sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, respectively. The confiscation of Rs. 99,800 was deemed legally justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 192 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457965</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed by the court, affirming the adjudication order, including penalties and confiscation. It was upheld that Associated Travel Agency (P.) Ltd. and the individual involved contravened Sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, respectively. The confiscation of Rs. 99,800 was deemed legally justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>