<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 349 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457967</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant did not contravene Sections 8(1), 14, or 47 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It concluded that the appellant&#039;s actions were within legal boundaries, as the foreign exchange was acquired lawfully and remitted within the prescribed time. The charges were not substantiated, resulting in a successful appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 349 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457967</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant did not contravene Sections 8(1), 14, or 47 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It concluded that the appellant&#039;s actions were within legal boundaries, as the foreign exchange was acquired lawfully and remitted within the prescribed time. The charges were not substantiated, resulting in a successful appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>