<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 387 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457968</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board dismissed the appeal as time-barred, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The appeal, received by the Board on 11-6-1990, exceeded the 90-day limit for filing, and the Board lacks authority to condone delays beyond this period. The Board stressed the importance of the date of receipt by the Registry in calculating the limitation period and highlighted the necessity for appellants to comply with procedural deadlines. This decision underscores the limitations on the Board&#039;s discretion concerning condonation of delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 387 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457968</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board dismissed the appeal as time-barred, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The appeal, received by the Board on 11-6-1990, exceeded the 90-day limit for filing, and the Board lacks authority to condone delays beyond this period. The Board stressed the importance of the date of receipt by the Registry in calculating the limitation period and highlighted the necessity for appellants to comply with procedural deadlines. This decision underscores the limitations on the Board&#039;s discretion concerning condonation of delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>