<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 412 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457970</link>
    <description>The appellant faced allegations of contravening the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, resulting in penalties and confiscation of foreign exchange. The AO imposed penalties totaling Rs. 5,500, which were later consolidated to Rs. 5,000 on appeal. The confiscation order was overturned due to lack of evidence of unlawful acquisition, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 412 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457970</link>
      <description>The appellant faced allegations of contravening the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, resulting in penalties and confiscation of foreign exchange. The AO imposed penalties totaling Rs. 5,500, which were later consolidated to Rs. 5,000 on appeal. The confiscation order was overturned due to lack of evidence of unlawful acquisition, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>