<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 385 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the adjudication order imposing penalties and confiscation under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It found the appellant&#039;s confessional statement voluntary and corroborated, rejecting claims of misunderstanding. The Tribunal ruled the penalties and confiscation reasonable, emphasizing the sufficiency of evidence and the burden of proof on the prosecuting agency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 385 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the adjudication order imposing penalties and confiscation under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It found the appellant&#039;s confessional statement voluntary and corroborated, rejecting claims of misunderstanding. The Tribunal ruled the penalties and confiscation reasonable, emphasizing the sufficiency of evidence and the burden of proof on the prosecuting agency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>