<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (4) TMI 235 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457975</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for contravening the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Despite the appeal being filed beyond the prescribed period, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to entertain the appeal. The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s actions constituted mere preparation, not an attempt, to contravene the Act. Consequently, the order was overturned, and the penalty amount was refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (4) TMI 235 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457975</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for contravening the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Despite the appeal being filed beyond the prescribed period, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to entertain the appeal. The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s actions constituted mere preparation, not an attempt, to contravene the Act. Consequently, the order was overturned, and the penalty amount was refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>