<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 364 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the Adjudicating Officer&#039;s decision regarding the contravention of section 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the associated Rs. 5,000 penalty. However, it upheld the charges under sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d), maintaining the Rs. 20,000 penalty. The appellant must pay a total penalty of Rs. 20,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 364 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the Adjudicating Officer&#039;s decision regarding the contravention of section 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the associated Rs. 5,000 penalty. However, it upheld the charges under sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d), maintaining the Rs. 20,000 penalty. The appellant must pay a total penalty of Rs. 20,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>