https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457978 The Subordinate Judge, Gudivada, dismissed the petitions filed by the insolvent's wife seeking a share in the partition, citing the obsolescence of her right under Hindu Law in Southern India. The High Court upheld this decision, affirming that historical precedents and customs do not support the wife's claim. The revision petitions were dismissed with costs, reinforcing the view that female partition rights have become obsolete in this region. en-us Tue, 15 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:17:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457978 The Subordinate Judge, Gudivada, dismissed the petitions filed by the insolvent's wife seeking a share in the partition, citing the obsolescence of her right under Hindu Law in Southern India. The High Court upheld this decision, affirming that historical precedents and customs do not support the wife's claim. The revision petitions were dismissed with costs, reinforcing the view that female partition rights have become obsolete in this region. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457978