<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds Commissioner&#039;s Revision; Assessee&#039;s Appeal Dismissed Due to Inadequate Inquiry by Assessing Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81858</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s revision order u/s 263 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO), after reopening the assessment u/s 147, failed to conduct a detailed inquiry and verification regarding the reasons for reopening and the genuineness of the transactions. The order passed u/s 147 read with Section 144B lacked findings on these aspects, rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal rejected the contentions regarding non-application of mind by the Commissioner and the invalidity of the order u/s 147 due to non-addition of income. It held that the AO can make additions on other issues even if no addition is made for the reasons for reopening, and the order u.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:23:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:23:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds Commissioner&#039;s Revision; Assessee&#039;s Appeal Dismissed Due to Inadequate Inquiry by Assessing Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81858</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s revision order u/s 263 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO), after reopening the assessment u/s 147, failed to conduct a detailed inquiry and verification regarding the reasons for reopening and the genuineness of the transactions. The order passed u/s 147 read with Section 144B lacked findings on these aspects, rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal rejected the contentions regarding non-application of mind by the Commissioner and the invalidity of the order u/s 147 due to non-addition of income. It held that the AO can make additions on other issues even if no addition is made for the reasons for reopening, and the order u.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:23:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>