<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 13 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759414</link>
    <description>Prolonged pre-trial custody, coupled with a trial that had not commenced and a large witness list, supported release on bail where the accused was not solely responsible for the delay. The Court also treated parity with co-accused as a relevant consideration. On these facts, continued incarceration was found unjustified at that stage, and bail was granted pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 13 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759414</link>
      <description>Prolonged pre-trial custody, coupled with a trial that had not commenced and a large witness list, supported release on bail where the accused was not solely responsible for the delay. The Court also treated parity with co-accused as a relevant consideration. On these facts, continued incarceration was found unjustified at that stage, and bail was granted pending trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>