<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 20 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759421</link>
    <description>The SC disposed of the appeals due to a low tax effect, following the respondent&#039;s counsel&#039;s submission. All pending applications were also resolved. The matter was presided over by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and N. Kotiswar Singh. The appellant and respondent were represented by respective legal counsels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 20 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759421</link>
      <description>The SC disposed of the appeals due to a low tax effect, following the respondent&#039;s counsel&#039;s submission. All pending applications were also resolved. The matter was presided over by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and N. Kotiswar Singh. The appellant and respondent were represented by respective legal counsels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>