<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759429</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years, ruling that the AO lacked valid jurisdiction under section 147 as the assessee had furnished all requisite details and no failure occurred. The tribunal held that information from government websites cannot constitute fresh tangible material warranting reopening. On merits, the tribunal allowed section 54F deduction of Rs. 90 crores, determining that basement and second floor of the same property constitute a single residential unit, not separate properties, based on prior wealth tax proceedings. The AO&#039;s denial of deduction was rejected as the assessee had timely deposited sale proceeds in capital gains account scheme and obtained genuine loan from Alert Buildtech for investment purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759429</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years, ruling that the AO lacked valid jurisdiction under section 147 as the assessee had furnished all requisite details and no failure occurred. The tribunal held that information from government websites cannot constitute fresh tangible material warranting reopening. On merits, the tribunal allowed section 54F deduction of Rs. 90 crores, determining that basement and second floor of the same property constitute a single residential unit, not separate properties, based on prior wealth tax proceedings. The AO&#039;s denial of deduction was rejected as the assessee had timely deposited sale proceeds in capital gains account scheme and obtained genuine loan from Alert Buildtech for investment purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>