<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 30 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759431</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that penalty under section 271AAB(1A)(b) cannot be levied when the assessee made suo moto disallowance of personal expenses in the return filed pursuant to section 153A notice. The tribunal found no concealment was detected in the search assessment. Following the Delhi HC precedent in Neeraj Jindal case, the penalty levy was deleted as the issue was no longer res-integra.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 30 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759431</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that penalty under section 271AAB(1A)(b) cannot be levied when the assessee made suo moto disallowance of personal expenses in the return filed pursuant to section 153A notice. The tribunal found no concealment was detected in the search assessment. Following the Delhi HC precedent in Neeraj Jindal case, the penalty levy was deleted as the issue was no longer res-integra.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>