<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 37 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759438</link>
    <description>Delay in refiling was condoned, but the application seeking condonation of the 660-day delay in filing the special leave petition was dismissed, and the special leave petition failed both on delay and on merits. The Court therefore declined to entertain the petition after finding no sufficient basis to excuse the delayed filing, and the substantive challenge was also rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 37 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759438</link>
      <description>Delay in refiling was condoned, but the application seeking condonation of the 660-day delay in filing the special leave petition was dismissed, and the special leave petition failed both on delay and on merits. The Court therefore declined to entertain the petition after finding no sufficient basis to excuse the delayed filing, and the substantive challenge was also rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>