https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457919 The appeal was allowed by the Board, setting aside the impugned Adjudication Order against the appellant for contravening sections of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Board found the charges unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence and disputes over a credit note's authenticity. The respondents were directed to refund the penalty amount deposited by the appellant within a specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:24:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457919 The appeal was allowed by the Board, setting aside the impugned Adjudication Order against the appellant for contravening sections of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Board found the charges unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence and disputes over a credit note's authenticity. The respondents were directed to refund the penalty amount deposited by the appellant within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457919