<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1472 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457942</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding AY 2005-06 was dismissed by the HC, as no substantial question of law was identified. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition concerning customer advances was rejected, relying on a precedent set by the SC. The order for AYs 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 remains upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1472 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457942</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding AY 2005-06 was dismissed by the HC, as no substantial question of law was identified. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition concerning customer advances was rejected, relying on a precedent set by the SC. The order for AYs 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 remains upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>