<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 607 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457899</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the confiscation of Rs. 1,98,000 and dismissing the contravention of Section 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It upheld the contravention of Section 8(1) for &quot;otherwise acquiring foreign exchange,&quot; maintaining a penalty of Rs. 32,000. The respondent must refund Rs. 1,68,000 to the appellant within 45 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 607 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457899</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the confiscation of Rs. 1,98,000 and dismissing the contravention of Section 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It upheld the contravention of Section 8(1) for &quot;otherwise acquiring foreign exchange,&quot; maintaining a penalty of Rs. 32,000. The respondent must refund Rs. 1,68,000 to the appellant within 45 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>