https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457904 The Tribunal found the appellant's statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act involuntary and inadmissible, dismissing the charge under Section 9(1)(d) of FERA. However, the contravention of Section 9(1)(b) was upheld for Rs. 4 lakhs. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 10,000, already paid as a pre-deposit, thereby partly allowing the appeal. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:19:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457904 The Tribunal found the appellant's statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act involuntary and inadmissible, dismissing the charge under Section 9(1)(d) of FERA. However, the contravention of Section 9(1)(b) was upheld for Rs. 4 lakhs. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 10,000, already paid as a pre-deposit, thereby partly allowing the appeal. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457904