<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 435 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457905</link>
    <description>The appeal partially succeeded, with the Chairman overturning the contravention charge under section 9(1)(b) and the confiscation of Rs. 3,50,000. However, the contravention of section 9(1)(d) was upheld for a specific amount, and the penalty for section 8(1) was sustained. The appellant must pay the sustained penalty from the confiscated amount, with the balance refunded within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 435 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457905</link>
      <description>The appeal partially succeeded, with the Chairman overturning the contravention charge under section 9(1)(b) and the confiscation of Rs. 3,50,000. However, the contravention of section 9(1)(d) was upheld for a specific amount, and the penalty for section 8(1) was sustained. The appellant must pay the sustained penalty from the confiscated amount, with the balance refunded within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>