<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 252 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for contravening the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act by receiving Rs. 2,59,000 without RBI permission. Despite procedural irregularities and disputed evidence, the Tribunal found sufficient grounds to support the contravention. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to pay the penalty within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 252 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for contravening the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act by receiving Rs. 2,59,000 without RBI permission. Despite procedural irregularities and disputed evidence, the Tribunal found sufficient grounds to support the contravention. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to pay the penalty within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>