<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Grants Duty Benefits to Fiber Manufacturer, Rules Popcorn Waste Usage Doesn&#039;t Disqualify Concession.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81839</link>
    <description>The appellant manufactured polyester staple fiber (PSF) using PET bottles scrap (90%) and popcorn waste (less than 10%). The department denied the nil/concessional duty benefit under relevant notifications, alleging popcorn is not plastic waste and the appellant suppressed facts. The Tribunal held that in the absence of words like &#039;only&#039;, &#039;exclusively&#039; in the notifications, the benefit cannot be denied merely for using a small quantity of popcorn waste along with PET bottles scrap. Popcorn being manufactured from plastic waste/scrap, cannot be excluded from the notifications&#039; scope. Regarding extended period of limitation, the Tribunal held that mere non-disclosure is not suppression unless deliberate to evade duty. The appellant disclosed .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:32:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Grants Duty Benefits to Fiber Manufacturer, Rules Popcorn Waste Usage Doesn&#039;t Disqualify Concession.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81839</link>
      <description>The appellant manufactured polyester staple fiber (PSF) using PET bottles scrap (90%) and popcorn waste (less than 10%). The department denied the nil/concessional duty benefit under relevant notifications, alleging popcorn is not plastic waste and the appellant suppressed facts. The Tribunal held that in the absence of words like &#039;only&#039;, &#039;exclusively&#039; in the notifications, the benefit cannot be denied merely for using a small quantity of popcorn waste along with PET bottles scrap. Popcorn being manufactured from plastic waste/scrap, cannot be excluded from the notifications&#039; scope. Regarding extended period of limitation, the Tribunal held that mere non-disclosure is not suppression unless deliberate to evade duty. The appellant disclosed .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:32:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>