<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal was justified in permitting the assessee to raise a new contention regarding the assessment of income under the head &quot;business.&quot; The fees earned by the assessee under the agreement were deemed as business income under section 28, enabling the deduction of research and development expenses. The court ordered the department to cover the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal was justified in permitting the assessee to raise a new contention regarding the assessment of income under the head &quot;business.&quot; The fees earned by the assessee under the agreement were deemed as business income under section 28, enabling the deduction of research and development expenses. The court ordered the department to cover the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>