https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759342 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 37 appellate interference is confined to checking whether the Section 34 court stayed within its narrow jurisdiction and did not exceed the limited grounds for setting aside an award. The appellate court cannot reappraise evidence, conduct an independent merits review, or substitute another possible view for the arbitral tribunal's view. Applying that restraint, the arbitral award could not be disturbed because it was supported by evidence and no recognised Section 34 infirmity, such as conflict with public policy, fundamental policy of Indian law, or the agreement, had been shown. The High Court's interference was therefore legally unsustainable, and the award stood restored. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Sep 2024 13:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759342 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 37 appellate interference is confined to checking whether the Section 34 court stayed within its narrow jurisdiction and did not exceed the limited grounds for setting aside an award. The appellate court cannot reappraise evidence, conduct an independent merits review, or substitute another possible view for the arbitral tribunal's view. Applying that restraint, the arbitral award could not be disturbed because it was supported by evidence and no recognised Section 34 infirmity, such as conflict with public policy, fundamental policy of Indian law, or the agreement, had been shown. The High Court's interference was therefore legally unsustainable, and the award stood restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759342