https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759343 A belated writ challenge to a concluded auction sale was not entertained where the appellant knew the valuation and upset price, failed to object in time, and third-party rights had already crystallised; the sale in favour of the auction purchaser was upheld. Even so, the Court exercised constitutional power to do complete justice and granted quantified monetary relief to balance the equities, directing payment in full and final settlement of dues with default interest for delay. The ruling distinguishes between interference with a finalised auction, which was declined on the facts, and separate equitable monetary relief, which was allowed despite the sale remaining undisturbed. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:45:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759343 A belated writ challenge to a concluded auction sale was not entertained where the appellant knew the valuation and upset price, failed to object in time, and third-party rights had already crystallised; the sale in favour of the auction purchaser was upheld. Even so, the Court exercised constitutional power to do complete justice and granted quantified monetary relief to balance the equities, directing payment in full and final settlement of dues with default interest for delay. The ruling distinguishes between interference with a finalised auction, which was declined on the facts, and separate equitable monetary relief, which was allowed despite the sale remaining undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759343